Skip to content
South Wales Copywriter » The Invisible Strings

The Invisible Strings

The Invisible Strings
The Invisible Strings

Here’s a very short poem that I wrote in a PeopleSpeakUp Zoom workshop today. It’s a bit different from my normal style. I hope you all enjoy it!

I wonder many things

like- how does the moon hide

the invisible strings

to pull the tide?

Or- how the great sky

runs on forever

with no need to try

I think it’s clever

And where do dandelions lay

when it’s time for bed

and how do they

make a clock from their head?

Image by tlcdesignstudio from Pixabay

11 thoughts on “The Invisible Strings”

  1. The world of levers and strings lies just beneath the surface of it all. We may imagine it to be fantastical or mechanical, or perhaps one and the same. Science and Art converge in the imagination, and who are we to say that this is just a construct of our own minds? Perhaps this convergence is closer to the objective truth of how the universe works in all its dimensions. Poetry offers glimpses of this mystery and invites a feeling response or an analytical interpretation that invites the reader into Nature’s Oracle.

    1. I love that you find so much in everything! Although saying that, these 12 lines are essentially many sleepless nights worth of pondering, especially about how the sky goes on forever! I spent a lot of years worrying about how they could squeeze so much infinity into the universe.

      1. If Aristotle is correct, and the universe is eternal, then infinitude is a drop in the bucket for the universe. What seems inconceivably vast for us would be nothing for the universe. Like everything I suppose it is a matter of perspective.

            1. I heard there was an infinite number of other universes. In each one there’s a different version of each of us making subtly different mistakes to the ones we make in this universe. But then again, there night just be a forever of emptiness filled with all of the sleep I lost pondering it.

            2. The answer to your questions depends upon the perspective of the questioner. From our perspective, since we are not eternal, the idea of an infinitely large bucket is an absurdity. The reason is that by definition there are neither spatial nor temporal edges in any direction to true infinity, and so the infinite bucket would have no edges with which to contain anything. The perspective is different for eternity. Most Westerners identity eternality with “God.” Aristotle identified it with the “universe.” However conceived, eternality definitionally is absolute being lacking nothing. It is fully itself and realized in everything. It contains everything including even the Platonic Ideas or abstractions. By definition, it would include also infinitude. For us, to speak of “containing” infinitude is senseless. For eternal being, it is part and parcel of what it means to be eternal. The main difference between eternal being and infinitude is that eternal being by definition is self-existing and the idea of infinity, like every other idea, somehow derives from eternity. The Greeks and the Gnostics defined this as an “emanation” from the “One,” or something along those lines. The Christians wrestled with this philosophical problem in their differentiations between “begotten, not made” in defining the Second Person of the Trinity and with “created” or “made” in defining everything else but God. Regardless, the reality or absurdity of an idea such as an “infinite bucket” ultimately comes down to the eternal or not eternal perspective of the observer and, in our case, the questioner.

    2. I like the slightly whimsical tone here, and particularly the last two lines. Short poems can cover a lot of ground…a bit like a dandelion’s seeds.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Optimized by Optimole